Category Archives: artisanship

You Can Buy Dan Liebermann!

No, no! Not the man! He’s been dead for years. His houses! Liebermann was a student of Frank Llyod Wright, and he did some amazing houses in the San Fransisco area.

One is for sale right now. Here is that story.

We are talking about stuff like this

Image result for Daniel Lieberman house

And this

Mirrors complement the glass walls to make the space feel even larger.

What do you think?

The Latest in Crossover Marketing from Soho House

Soho is, of course, a place in London. And it is much more. It is also an idea and a set of values. The idea and the values derived from things that took place in Soho over many decades, when folks went to Soho (or lived there) for its free spirited and often off the rails atmosphere. Folks still go there for that.

Soho House in Soho took over the idea and values, and turned it into a club for creative types. You can join Soho House and enjoy Soho House locations in loads of major cities. Part of the allure is that Soho House pays a lot of attention to the unique atmosphere  it achieves in each place.  Brilliant.

With 23 houses in the U.K., Berlin, Istanbul, Barcelona, Amsterdam, New York, Los Angeles, Miami, Chicago, Hong Kong, Toronto and Mumbai, each house is uniquely decorated with its own character and aesthetic based on the location.

Here is an image from Soho House Istanbul

Image result for Soho House

And this image is from Soho House Mumbai

Image result for Soho House

The next step?`Why not sell the items that people experience in its various locations via the web? Indeed, Soho House is doing that.

It will be fun to see how this works out.


Where did Baudelaire Buy Shirts? And More!

Paris is loaded with fascinating public spaces that have historical interest. Few cities have more, and fewer still embrace their traditions the way Parisians do.

One of those historic establishments is the shirt maker Charvet.

Image result for Charvet

Wikipedia has this to say

The world’s first ever shirt shop, Charvet was founded in 1838. Since the 19th century, it has supplied bespoke shirts and haberdashery to kings, princes and heads of state. It has acquired an international reputation for the high quality of its products, the level of its service and the wide range of its designs and colors. Thanks to the renown of its ties, charvet has become a generic name for a certain type of silk fabric used for ties.

BTW, the founder’s father had been curator of the wardrobe of Napoleon. That gave Christofle Charvet a great head start. But there was something else going on

Christofle Charvet created the first shirtmaker store in Paris, for which the new term chemisier (shirtmaker) was coined. Previously, shirts were generally made by linen keepers with fabric provided by the customer,but in this store of a new kind, clients were measured, fabric selected and shirts made on site.[The development of this specialty trade was favored by a change in men’s fashion, with more importance given to the waistcoat and the shirt collar, which called for more propositions for the shirt front and a technical change. Previously, shirts were cut by linen keepers entirely of rectangles and squares. There were no shaping seams and no need for shirt patterns. The new interest for a closer fitting shirt led to curving the armhole and neckline or adding a shoulder yoke, by application to the shirt of tailoring techniques. The new kind of shirt was called chemise à pièce (yoked shirt).  Alan Flusser credits Christofle Charvet with the original design of a collar that could be turned down or folded, much in the manner of contemporary collars, and the concept of the detachable collar.

In those days, the most elegant men belonged to the “Jockey Club”. Charvet advertised himself as shirt maker to the club. Who could resist that?

Image result for Charvet history

And if stories like the above interest you, check out this list of other Parisian destination locations! Most important, enjoy!

Is Blogging Dead?

The question whether blogging is dead was first posed years ago. At that time, some argued that long form personal writing on websites called “blogs” had lost its audience. Perhaps our attention spans were getting too short to tolerate lots of blah blah blah. Readers wanted Twitter and Facebook types of content.  Even worse, some argued that reading itself was dead. It was just too much work compared to looking at shared pictures and watching video.

That was years ago. So what happened since then? Well, blogging has not become as popular as sex, drugs or rock and roll. Blogging has not become the career choice that parents push on their reluctant kids. But it has not died out either. Lots and lots of people still blog. And some (like me) have stuck with it for a long time.

So what is going on? We might think about this from a historical perspective. The early days of blogging produced endless chit chat about “scaling” and “monetizing” content generation. One was supposed to be able to get thousands of page views — or even better, unique visits — per post. And if you were able to pull this off, you could quit your day job and monetize your blog.  Here is a link to a post from 2008 that discusses how this monetizing might pay off.

The reality is that the average blogger was not able to do any of this. The average blogger did his or her best to link personal experience and knowledge to the world via regular blog posts.  This produced a tsunami of mediocre writing and a lot of frustration among folks who found out that writing is hard work and developing a wide following is not easy when everyone under the sun is trying to do the same thing. That led to the drum beat that blogging is dead.  It exhausted its audience and did not live up to the promise.

Guilty as charged. At the same time, it is amusing to think back now how sure we all were that scaling and monetizing were in fact the appropriate measures of blogging success. The reality was that we all were newbies to the game of democratized content generation. Given how large the shift in mindset from passive consumers of media to active creators of media, it would have been amazing if everyone would figure out how to add value right from the get go. The fact that we didn’t should have been expected. Some did, and lots of us didn’t, despite our best efforts.  So it goes.

In the meantime, we actually have figured out a few things about democratized content generation. Here are three reflections

  • We were foolish to believe that we all could be broadcasters.

Broadcast media is a 20th century invention. It came about when technology (more specifically radio and TV) offered new channels for capitalized media outlets to bombard messages to massive numbers of consumers — advertising. Because there were high barriers to entry, and such large audiences, media outlets could control the flow of content and profit hugely as gatekeepers. Broadcasting appeared to be powerful.

But this model breaks down when we all can broadcast. We all exhaust ourselves shouting out to each other, while few of us listen. So democratizing media means we must get beyond the idea that media and broadcasting are the same.  They are not. Effective use of digital media — blogging included — is more like conversation generation than broadcasting.

  • When everyone is posting, we need more dynamic curation to be able to find great content. . Chris Brogan writes

(While blogging is not dead), … the act of visiting a specific website for a specific blog post (may be dead), unless you got there via Google search. People don’t eagerly work through their RSS readers (except the die hards). People are subscribing less and less to blogs outright.

They’re consuming blogs on places like Facebook and Twitter and Pinterest and elsewhere. They’re clicking through from lots of various sources instead of coming directly to the blog.

Chris has a point. Even assuming you can create valuable content on a regular basis on your blog, most of your target group will never find out about you without some sort of curation.  And so far, our curation platforms basically suck.They are mired in conflicts of interest and they are not dynamic.

We are starting to think more clearly about curation. But we do not have a good model that treats it with the respect that it deserves. Good curation is like good party hosting — something that sounds old fashioned but has a lot to be said for it.

  • People who want to create content will do it, but that doesn’t mean that they will learn from what they do.

One reason that blogging hasn’t died is that a lot of people feel compelled to write. They will continue to write, even if it does not pay off.  That is both good and bad. The good part is that it seems that at least some humans like reaching out to others. The bad part is that without any real hope of a pay off, we lack an intuitive tool to “level up”. How do we assess what we are learning?

That leveling up has at least three components. The first is to write better. This is an obvious need. The second is to learn more from what we write. Less saying what we believe to be true and more discussing how we got there and how we could do better. The third is making better links between writer and readers.  Writing should strengthen community not fragment it.

Starting conversations, party hosting and building eloquent communities. Three pillars of digital ecology building? Perhaps so. Ideally, this ecology would offer a person an easy way into a network. Something like membership. It would also offer the person a way to share life stories. Something like we do in party talk. It should also offer ways to raise questions that start off conversations. It should also offer ways to build threads of ideas that emerge from the conversation. And finally it should offer ways to turn these threads into “set pieces”. The compilation of  knowledge that can serve broader audiences.

Membership, stories, questioning, conversation threads, and set pieces.Five steps towards using democratic content generation to add value And in each we need better connversations, better curation and better leveling up.

I think blogging can play a role in the above platforming. Indeed, it can play lots of roles. But more important than whether we call this blogging, is that we see its advantages as a daily activity.

Think of it this way. The Principia (1687) is one of the greatest books ever written. Newton created it, but publishing it was not his idea. It was Halley’s. In other words,  the fact that we have it all is the result of an accidental encounter between the two men. Oops!

Using the vocabulary I have set forth here, the Pinciplia is a great set piece. In the 21st century, we might aspire to developing in a more systematic way to develop and distribute many more great set pieces that draw together many more people in the process.  This would bring to life Steve Johnson’s interesting paradigm – great ideas evolve out of great conversations.

We are not there yet.



Brooklyn Pizza? You Mean Di Fara!

Dominico tells his story

I’m 69 years old. I’ve been in Brooklyn since 1959. I’m from Provincia di Caserta in Italy, near Napoli. When I got here, I spent three months in Long Island, in Huntington, working on a farm… then somebody put a bug in my head and said there’s a good spot on Avenue J. I didn’t even know Avenue J existed. So I come over here with my accountant on a Saturday night, and this corner was for rent. It was so crowded, the street. So I take the phone number, I call the landlord, and he says to come see me Sunday, make sure you bring a deposit. When I opened the store, my partner’s name was Farina. My name is DeMarco. So when the lawyer made the paper, he put the two names together. Di Fara. Di for me, and Fara for him. I bought my partner out in 1978, I think. I kept the same name; I didn’t bother changing it.

Note: Domenico makes the best pizza in Brooklyn. It’s not cheap, but man it is good!

Black Pepper from Phu Quoc

I was looking around for images and ideas for a trip to Vietnam when I stumbled on this tidbit from 7 atractive destinations

Phu Quoc is not really part of the Mekong Delta and doesn’t share the delta’s extraordinary ability to produce rice. The most valuable crop is black pepper, but the islanders here have traditionally earned their living from the sea. Phu Quoc is also famous in Vietnam for its production of high-quality fish sauce (nuoc mam).

Here is an image of a beach at phu quoc


wonderful colors! There are a few 4 start hotels

but about that black pepper? It looks like a nice product – no chemicals and dried in sunlight.  The UK Spice Shop recommends it

I wonder how well it does on international markets. It turns out

Over the last ten years Vietnam has gradually increased its influence on pepper international market. This Asian country is the world’s leading exporter of black pepper (about 85,000 tons per year) for two reasons: firstly, its favorable climate conditions and rural traditions in the cultivation of pepper; secondly, domestic use is almost zero.

Very cool!

Imagination, Reality and Excitement

A few days ago, I bumped into a new concept called the ripple effect. It was something that Steve Jobs thought quite a bit ab out and believed in.

It works like this. We all are capable of imagining things that we want. That might be a pizza and a beer or solving climate change. It is whatever strikes you as important because it is desirable and we don’t have it now.

But here is where humans have trouble. Our realities are detached from the vision. BTW, I use the plural of realities for a purpose. Reality, the singular, is in fact a stream of individual realities in given moments. These realities  will continue flowing without regard to achieving anything in particular.

This means that what we do during real moments has ripple effects for imagined outcomes. Everything we do and choose not to do has ripple effects. There  is no such thing as neutral reality in this regard. That is what gives reality its exciting quality.

Ripple effects are like the food that nurture our imaginations. If we are aware of them and mind them, we open the door to more nuanced visions of what is possible to do. That can be bounded or unbounded.

Remember – realities are the food stuffs for our imaginations.