A Fine Kettle of Fish, that is!

At first blush, this seems to make no sense at all. A fine kettle of fish? Who puts fish in a kettle anyway? Isn’t a kettle for tea? Fish tea, anyone?`

To understand the phrase, you need a bit of history. The Scotts used a cooking device that they called a kettle to poach fish. A kettle of fish makes sense from that perspective. At some point, however, calling it a “fine kettle of fish” came to mean quite a mess. Because of the bones? That we do not know.  But a fine kettle of fish is in fact, quite a messy situation.

And while we are at this, I used the word “poach”. Poaching was stealing game from the lord’s property. It was punishable by death in some cases. And yet it is also a cooking method – throwing something into simmering water. Huh?

The word comes from the french – and poaching originally meant putting something into a bag (pochier). Hence the stealing idea. You sneak the pheasant into a bag and get the hell out of there! Poaching as a cooking technique originally assumed a bag as well.  It might make some sense for eggs. When you poach an egg, the white forms a sort of pocket around the yolk. So you are putting the yolk in a pocket. And poached fish? Err … I’ll get back to you on that one!

MEA CULPA! Note the correction in the comments! It was not just the Scotts who used a kettle!


3 thoughts on “A Fine Kettle of Fish, that is!”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s